I agree about the problem with Natural News and of course pseudo-science is a big problem. There's got to be a way to discuss, refute things like this without attacking individual people, right? I have seen so much hatred going back and forth between people lately about this stuff, it definitely seems anti-productive. Do we really want to create (or perpetuate) an environment of shaming people for being wrong? Attacking people rather than ideas, drawing battle lines, seems the least likely way to move society forward (assuming that is the most important goal).
Here is a recent post on, of all places, the Terence Mckenna group page on Face book, on Feb 14, 2015. The tread proceeded to spiral into 100+comments of hatred coming from both "sides" of the issue, as it always seems to.
Here is my comment:
"It is pretty funny. I have never seen this issue talked about rationally, with out hate. The emotional immaturity of many people who claim to stand up for science is pretty depressing. Science is something that I am actually very passionate about. The only thing you are accomplishing by calling people idiots is to turn them even further from science. You might think that you are sticking up for science, but you are only making it look invalid by being so petty. If something is true, it does not need you, the novice foot-soldier, to protect it.
This is the behavior of extremist religions, who, standing on shaky ground, violently, defensively protecting their mythology. This is because their beliefs are incredibly weak and vulnerable, thus needing constant protection from anyone who might question. Science is not like that. It is not weak and it is not a mythology, therefore, it does not need you to protect it with infantile behavior.
You do more harm to science than good by acting like a child. Have scientists asked for your help in defending their work? I doubt they would have anything to do with a person who advocates fascist dictators rounding up the scientifically skeptical or illiterate into camps. Science itself was actually a rebellion from the dogma and witch hunt, Seth.
When I see behavior like this I begin to think that someone has been planted into the group in order to distract and sow conflict, possibly to further separate people from any trust in the scientific community. The recent Snowden Leaks show that agents have been doing exactly this kind of thing on social media sites since at least 2008. It is a very effective tactic to support the status quo; encourage people in a community to fight against themselves, bring the level of anger and hatred up as high as possible. People will forever fight amongst themselves rather than exchange meaningful information and engage in critical thought on topics which matter. This is also similar to the purpose of "hate week", to borrow from Orwell' playbook." -NAC
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Saturday, May 31, 2014
Some Good Points about "Conspiracy" Theories
Anon:
Yeah, this kinda bullshit is why so many people don't take anarchism and the far left in general seriously as a political philosophy, association with this sort of nonsense, please for fucks sake cut this conspiracy theory bullshit out!
There is more than enough horrible stuff in the world that actually 100% definitely happened to deal with without speculating on bullshit that might've happened! All it does is distract from the real issues that are actually definitely happening and discredit people trying to help deal with them by association.
Anon 2:
There are even real conspiracies - people conspire to do all kinds of shit, most of it relatively out in the open and most of the rest of it very poorly hidden. It's crazy that there's a genre called "conspiracy theories" - about everything from contrails to chupacabras to UFOs to specific business clubs - that are all linked not by their content, but by their disconnection from ordinary standards of evidence.
Or - again, more specifically - what's crazy is that "conspiracy theorists" treat it as a genre and are afficionados of hypotheses/explanations for phenomena that aren't connected to ordinary standards of evidence, and in fact become suspicious of evidence that's held to any standard.
Anon 3:
The fact that there is a conspiracy to maintain a class system overshadows all other conspiracies. But this isn't a conspiracy, right? It's just the system.
Anon 4:
I don't think they like to mention obvious things like that because it isn't supposedly esoteric knowledge and so it doesn't make them feel like they are smarter than everyone else, which appears to be the real motivation.
- Chet Gaines my issue with the "conspiracy theory" narrative is that it often is a substitute for an understanding of social systems and human behavior. instead of understanding that corruption and conspiracy come from systemic flaws, often times boogeymen are constructed and believers are allowed to still have faith in standard political and economic myths while blaming the shortcomings of these systems on "evil" individuals whose plotting prevents the system from working properly. it's a way of understanding society backwards (see alex jones). of course people get together and do nefarious things. that's not particularly interesting in and of itself.
Anon 5:
Seriously though my real problem with it is that it infects actual real politics by association. Can anyone here honestly tell be they haven't been called a conspiracy theorist for stating an actual real life political fact like "Bush and co used faulty information on Iraq" or "There is a conflict of interest with government regulators trying to regulate companies the government gets huge tax revenue from" or a million other things?
Anon 6:
The amount of certainty that (certain) conspiracy theorists demonstrate in their claims can only be achieved by imbuing certain sources of information with neigh absolute authority ... in other words, you have read something by someone that claims to have special access to knowledge and believed them completely... which is against my anarchist principals.
Neil Adam Collins Thurs. June 19th, 2014:
I don't put ANYTHING past the government, personally. That still doesn't make me willing to believe any particular claim unless there is actual proof. This is not the way actual science works. Because the government HAS been exposed doing x and y, this does not prove they are also doing z. It does prove they have no morals and are CAPABLE of doing z, I'll give you that. However, I would add that they don't even NEED to do most of these conspiracy claims. Capitalism is doing just fine at this. The more you learn about how our economics system works, inherently and structurally, then you begin to see that these conspiracies are not even needed.
Pick any one of the claims of conspiracy.... Causing massive cancer, enslaving the human race, destroying the planet, impending global depopulation programs, etc...
These things are all accomplished by the monetary market system and yet this is largely ignored, although it is WIDE out in the open.
So WHY do we seem to gravitate towards the next claim of what 'they' are secretly doing, while ignoring the things 'they' are definitely doing out in the open? WHY?
This is a very important question. I have a few answers if anyone is interested.
Autumn: I am interested to hear your answers in regard to that. I definitely would like to see a happier world and I think the first step in the right direction is going to be achieved by awareness. People need to be aware of what is happening around them. This is why we have the news but unfortunately the media is controlled in my opinion so it is hard to say what news is exact and what is just stumble upon.
Neil Adam Collins I would also add that its more than likely that even the most thoughtful, critically thinking, open-minded of the conspiracy enthusiasts don't actually grasp the STRUCTURAL nature of our economic system, and instead see these these problems as "corruption", rather than built-in. It is very important to realize the nature of the capitalist system.
As for the question of "WHY do people gravitate toward "hidden" plots and conspiracies (many of them probably true, many not), while ignoring proven and obvious injustice that achieve the same agenda?"
We have a tendency to want to think in terms of "us and them", good people and bad people, "our tribe VS. the tribe on the other side of the mountain". So when the culprit is actually a social system, rather than a group of evil people, there is no one to blame, this is very inconvenient.
Also, hidden things are much more exciting! They are cool. There is a chance that we could be in the small group that 'knows' the secret, hidden info. This is very good for the ego.
Things that are already proven insult us; because if the world is this fuct up from things that everyone knows and takes for granted, how embarassing. It must be something more cunning that has eluded us.
I was reading the book "Science As A Candle In the Dark" by Carl Sagan and it was an amazing book, mostly about the question of 'why ddo so many people believe pseudo-science?' Also about the dangers of having a public which is science-illiterate. One of his main ideas as to WHY was because of the way science is taught in school. We all crave magical, spiritual mysteries. When science is taught to children as boring memorization of facts and latin words, the adult grows up falling for anything that will fill that natural need for things to be cool and interesting.
Lastly, I think it is because when we can blame some hidden group of evil men, such as the Rockafellers or who ever, we don't have to take responsibility for our perdicament. The cars we drive pollute the planet far worse than any chem-trails could. The plastic we use is destroying the oceans. The wealth we enjoy (in the western world) causes military strife and poverty around the world. The computers and phones we use to communicate are made from rare earth metals that are extracted by bare-foot slave labor in Africa and keeps those nations in perpetual poverty and war.
The richest 65 billionaires own as much wealth as the bottom half of the human race. Over 1 billion people on our planet lack food and clean drinking water (that is one in 7 humans).
The list goes on....
ALL OF THESE THINGS are the structural unfolding of global capitalism, not hidden conspiracies. The difference between chem-trail like things and the evil caused by our economic model, is that conspiracies deny you any responsibility when in fact we are all complicit. Very inconvenient.
Autumn:
I can say I agree that the system itself is corrupt but it took people to set up that system. So in that aspect, there was most likely some kind of intention and knowing that this would result from the system installed?
Neil Adam Collins
The capitalist system and the logic behind it was put together by thinkers in the 1700's when the world was a very different place and the understandings of science were different than they are now. Much of the core, underlying science that was used to develope and justify the capitalist model has been disproven by modern science. I have a few examples.
Thomas Malthus' theory of population is one of the core justifications for capitalism... has been disproven. Very interesting stuff.
The idea was that if everyone had what they needed (food, water, etc...) then the poor would reproduce exponentially, covering the earth in a few generations time. Therefore, there must be inequality and competition. Therefore the poor must always have struggle, starvation and disease to keep them in check.
Totally disproven. As people have increased quality of life, better health, education, adequate nutrition, clean drinking water, etc... As infant mortality rates drop.... as all of these things get better, the birthrate and population actually decrease and level off.
Autumn:
awareness and education will only bring us closer to the truth.
Neil Adam Collins
Very true. I also think that we have to cultivate an awareness that seeks the root causes to things rather than only focusing on the symptoms. Symptoms are important too, but we have to see that these things we call "corruption" are only to be expected in a system which inherently requires competition, scarcity, inequality, etc.. it is built into the monetary model. The very word "radical" means to 'go to the root'.
Autumn:
Symptoms are very important. We see this also in the healthcare field. They want to give us a pill to fix the symptom but not the underlying issue of the symptom.
ANOMALY HUNTING
"pseudoscience almost always works backwards – that is its primary malfunction, starting with a desired conclusion and then looking for evidence and twisting logic to support that conclusion."
Note: This does not only apply to popular pseudoscientific claims, but in our everyday thinking patterns as well. A good defense is one's awareness of his/her own capacity for Anomaly Hunting. Check for it regularly.
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/anomaly-hunting/
Speaking of Joe Rogan, it is very interesting to watch the episode where he asks Neil deGrasse Tyson about conspiracies such as chem-trails, the moon landing hoax and others. The whole episode is pretty much a conversation about conspiracy theories. The part about chem-trails begins at about minute 1:02.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpHh_TU2kcI
Neil Collins, April 7, 2015-
The problem I find with "conspiracy theorists" is that they seem to be fixated on symptoms of the problems in our world, rarely looking to root causes. They are actually many time right in the ideas about what the rich or governments are doing to lie to people, to exploit people, etc... But this is all for nothing when the focus continues to be on these surface issues.
Rarely do you hear some one who subscribes to the belief in chem-trails, for instance... rarely do you hear them concerned about pollution which is actually out in the open, which is causing the planet to burn under our feet. I'm not sure if it is because these obvious things are boring in comparison to the more 'hidden' and secret chem-trails, or if it is because actual pollution is something we are all contributing to and therefore inconvenient.
Another example is war. It can be very exciting to rally against covert government and CIA operations, but war which actually kills so many in our world, well, it is not so exciting to rally against war anymore, it seems.
And the most glaring one to me is the phenomenon of the Illuminati. People who are so excited and concerned about the illuminati, a secret sect of global elites who plot to control mankind through use of their accumulated wealth.... do not seem able or willing to contemplate the simple fact that the nature of money in it's self creates hierarchy, without even the need for any intention on anyone's part to enslave the masses consciously.
Yes, some people do plot to seek advantage over other people, many do not but the simple fact is that it is written into the mathematical nature of the monetary system. Hierarchy is an inherent nature of the money system itself. THIS is called seeing things in their root causes. The word "radical" means 'to go to the root'. One of the main problems with the so called "conspiracy theorist" is that they are rarely radical, besides rarely ever having any radical solutions (and many times no solutions at all) .
Speaking of Joe Rogan, it is very interesting to watch the episode where he asks Neil deGrasse Tyson about conspiracies such as chem-trails, the moon landing hoax and others. The whole episode is pretty much a conversation about conspiracy theories. The part about chem-trails begins at about minute 1:02.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpHh_TU2kcI
Neil Collins, April 7, 2015-
The problem I find with "conspiracy theorists" is that they seem to be fixated on symptoms of the problems in our world, rarely looking to root causes. They are actually many time right in the ideas about what the rich or governments are doing to lie to people, to exploit people, etc... But this is all for nothing when the focus continues to be on these surface issues.
Rarely do you hear some one who subscribes to the belief in chem-trails, for instance... rarely do you hear them concerned about pollution which is actually out in the open, which is causing the planet to burn under our feet. I'm not sure if it is because these obvious things are boring in comparison to the more 'hidden' and secret chem-trails, or if it is because actual pollution is something we are all contributing to and therefore inconvenient.
Another example is war. It can be very exciting to rally against covert government and CIA operations, but war which actually kills so many in our world, well, it is not so exciting to rally against war anymore, it seems.
And the most glaring one to me is the phenomenon of the Illuminati. People who are so excited and concerned about the illuminati, a secret sect of global elites who plot to control mankind through use of their accumulated wealth.... do not seem able or willing to contemplate the simple fact that the nature of money in it's self creates hierarchy, without even the need for any intention on anyone's part to enslave the masses consciously.
Yes, some people do plot to seek advantage over other people, many do not but the simple fact is that it is written into the mathematical nature of the monetary system. Hierarchy is an inherent nature of the money system itself. THIS is called seeing things in their root causes. The word "radical" means 'to go to the root'. One of the main problems with the so called "conspiracy theorist" is that they are rarely radical, besides rarely ever having any radical solutions (and many times no solutions at all) .
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Cosmos as required watching? Wut about muh Freedums?
It had been suggested that the T.V. show "COSMOS" with Neil
DeGrasse Tyson should be "required"viewing for children, Americans
and even all people of the world.
Many were against the idea claiming that NOTHING should be "required"
in America.
Here are my thoughts....
The topic of required viewing is an interesting one. I am all for freedom and definitely know what people mean as far as being against "required" anything. But consider this for one moment....
Would you "require" a person to receive driving instructions before they are out on the road with their 1000 pounds of metal and rubber car pointed at you? Would you "require" a person to have certain training before they design your building or a bridge that you will trust your life to?
I say this because it is an important question.... the question is,
Is it safe to have ignorant people walking around who lack basic critical thinking skills and will believe things even after they have been proven otherwise? Is it safe to have science "required" in schools but taught in a boring and dull way that causes future adults to have no interest in such an amazing subject? This boring way that science is taught in schools was said by Carl Sagan to be the reason that so many intelligent Americans fall for and even crave pseudoscience that is no where near being true.
I know that the American commenters here are obsessed with freedom and this is a great thing, until it gets in the way of logic.
I would just say that there are MANY things worse than being "required" to see this wonderful show about things that are actually real. Things like this just might save our ass.
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Some things you cannot unsee
I came across this post by a "friend" on Facebook. I was inspired to honestly
comment on what came to mind. After thinking about it, I decided not to post
my comment, but at the same time I felt as if it should exist somewhere.
Here is the post:
Here is what I wrote as a comment:
comment on what came to mind. After thinking about it, I decided not to post
my comment, but at the same time I felt as if it should exist somewhere.
Here is the post:
Here is what I wrote as a comment:
That same thing happened to me with some pictures that I saw on the internet last year. I will never unsee them. They were photos of the birth defects caused by the depleted uranium artillery shells which the USA used in Iraq. Horrific stuff. It took me about a week before I could close my eyes without seeing them. I felt it would be completely cruel and wrong to share those pictures with anyone but at the same time, those things are allowed to continue because we are over here safe and cozy, in the belly of our empire, insulated from having to see the consequences of our actions. We can "afford" to ignore the inconvenient things in this world that others cannot escape from.
Saturday, April 12, 2014
My notes for Aquaponics
Here is an interesting link. The article states that this 25 sq. ft. system can feed one adult human system with fish and vegetables all year long...
http://upriser.com/posts/this-aquaponic-farm-holds-20-000-lbs-of-fish-and-grows-70-000-vegetables-in-a-1-4-acre-area
Imagine:
From the lecture "Economic Calculation in an NL/RBE" by Peter Joseph...
40:35 Students at Columbia University determined that to feed 50,000 people,
a 30 story farm...
⬋
40:53 30 Story farm on 6.4 acres = feed 50,000 people
78 farms, using 0.1% Los Angeles
land Area = feed 3.9 million
41:15 Apply this to earth population of 7.2 billion. Need about 144, 000 verti-
cal farms to feed the whole world. 921,000 acres of land – given that
about 38% of earth's land is currently being used for traditional agri-
culture, we find that we only need about .006% of the earth's existing
agricultural requirements. If the current agricultural acreage was used to
put 30 story vertical farms side by side, then the food production would
be enough to feed 34,440,000,000,000 (34 trillion people).
42:25 We only need to harness about 0.02% of this theoretical capacity to feed
9 billion (2050 population)
42:40 Makes any argument moot.
So far I have watched many videos on Youtube about Hydroponics and aquaponics.
Two of my favorite videos so far are:
Internet of Farming: Arduino-based, backyard
aquaponics
and
Aquaponic Geodesic Dome Winter Tour
I have also recently finished reading 2 free PDF books,
"Barrel-ponics" by Travis W. Hughey, 2005
and
"Aquaponics, Common Sense Guide" by Michael Tezel, 2009
I found "Barrel-ponics" very helpful. I have downloaded many other PDF
documents on building Aquaponic systems and will be going through
each of them.
Tomorrow I will be attending 2 classes at MakerHouse for a total of
6 or 7 hours. I'm very excited to have some hands on instruction in
the building of these systems.
The classes are:
Intro to Aquaponics
9:15 am - 12:00 pm
and
Learn to Build an IBC
Aquaponics System
1:00 pm - 4:00 pm
These are
Workshop led by Tucson AquaPonics Project
and taught by Casey Townsend.
Here are a few
Here are a few
notes:
page 89 0of "Barrel-ponics":
(Chlorine gassing out)
"Let the system run a couple of days to allow the Hydrogen Peroxide or Chlorine to
gas out of the water."
(Adjusting PH)
"Once the system is up and running consistently for a couple days check and adjust
the pH. Adjusting the pH using un-iodized salt (preferably sea salt) to raise it and
vinegar to bring it down."
As far as checking the system with a water test kit goes you will see the following
happen:
First the ammonia will run up quite high. This is normal as the fish will be producing
it and the nitrifying bacteria haven't built up yet. If you start losing fish at this stage
simply remove some of the water and add some well water if possible. If well water
is not available it might be advisable to have some sterilized water on hand. Remember
this handy rule “The solution to pollution is dilution”
When the Nitrosomonas bacteria have built up to sufficient levels you will see the
ammonia to go to zero very quickly. This stage is where I killed a good many fish.
In my impatience I started loading up the fish at just the wrong time!! The second
phase of nitrification has yet to get started. The nitrites will go very high now until
the Nitrobacter reach sufficient levels to reduce the nitrites to almost zero. This is a
very critical time as the nitrites are very toxic to the fish. The nitrates will then rise
and this is where the system is producing the
nutrients for the plants to get healthy. This can take a few weeks to stabilize so don’t
get impatient.
Don't overfeed the fish and you are on your way to a very enjoyable hobby and a
wonderful way to weed free gardening. Have a seat and just watch and enjoy your
hard work!! Once your system is up and stabilized you will almost be able to watch
the plants grow!!
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Friday, March 21, 2014
ZDAY 2014, Tucson Speech
Here is a speech that I gave on Sunday, March 16th, 2014 at the first
annual "ZDAY Tucson" event, or "Zeitgeist Day. I am far from perfect as a
public speaker and was incredibly nervous, but the information is solid.
Enjoy
annual "ZDAY Tucson" event, or "Zeitgeist Day. I am far from perfect as a
public speaker and was incredibly nervous, but the information is solid.
Enjoy
Click this link to watch the video. It is 29 minutes long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4vBBV9Wrlc
The topic of the speech was a summary of the 2014 book titled
"The Zeitgeist Movement Defined". This book is available for sale or
FREE PDF DOWNLOAD at:
http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/orientation
Here is a basic transcript of my speech:
Hello. I will be talking about the new book that came out this February called
"The Zeitgeist Movement Defined". This 320 page book is available for free
online or can be ordered in paperback on Amazon and other book sellers, at cost.
The purpose of the book is to give the reader a detailed and informed
understanding of the "train of thought" that the Zeitgeist Movement advocates.
The format of the text is a series of essays, supported by over 800 footnotes and
citations, which source 3rd party research. This allows the reader to do further
learning concerning any of the information if they like.
The contributions of brilliant thinkers such as Buckminster Fuller, Jaques Fresco,
Jeremy Rifkin, Ray Kurzweil, Nikola Tesla, Carl Sagan and many more are quoted
and sourced for their work towards improving our world.
So, what is the train of thought of the Zeitgeist Movement, or TZM?
Obviously, I will only be giving a very brief summary due to time, but hopefully
I can cover a few of the most important points and encourage you to learn more.
Put in a sentence, TZM seeks to spread information and the awareness that our
society is dangerously out of date when it comes to what is possible due to the
scientific method and technical advances today, in terms of societal and
ecological sustainability.
Simplifying things, the Movement's focus can be looked at in 2 main parts.
First, it is important to understand what the most basic, root causes of the
problems that face our world are today. The second is to realize actual solutions,
mainly, the need to transition out of a scarcity-driven, competitive market and
into a Resource Based Economic model, or 'RBE'.
If we really want to understand what the root-causes to the problems today are,
then we have to look at our economic system a what it was designed to do. This
is where the origin becomes clear, as to these root causes.
The most basic, fundamental rules operating at the core of the capitalist economic
model are;
-The need for constant growth
- scarcity
-profit
-competition
These things are important to understand because they are in direct conflict with
sustainability and human well-being. Without constant growth, the economic model
collapses, as it requires money to be constantly moving around in the economy.
It also requires people to have jobs, so that they can continually buy things, in order
to keep up consumption rates.
One way to think about this is to picture a company which sells, let's say a toaster...
or really product, but lets just say a toaster. If the toaster is built to last 100 years,
that company will not have repeat sales and will probably go out of business.So, it is in the companies survival interest, that they design products which will
need to be replaced in a predictable amount of time. This business strategy is
no secret and is called "planned obsolescence".
The consequences of this need for infinite growth were not considered during the
17th century, when the capitalist ideology was being developed by people like
Adam Smith and others. However, now these consequences are becoming clear
when it is pointed out that we live on a finite planet. Nothing can grow forever.
In many ways, the capitalist model operates with the same principals as a cancer cell.
Cancer cells themselves lack the ability to stop growing and are blind to the well being
of the organism which they are a part of. It is an interesting analogy.
According to a study:
"The excess use of the Earth's resources or 'overshoot' is possible
because resources can be harvested faster than they can be replaced.
The cumulative overshoot from the mid 1980's to 2002 resulted in an
ecological debt that would take 2.5 Earths to pay. In a 'business as
usual' scenario, our demands on this planet could amount to the
productivity of 27 planets by 2050."
Marine Ecology Progress Series, VOL. 434: p 261, 2011
To understand how things like this can be allowed to happen, it's important to realize
that our economic system is "life blind". Nowhere in the capitalist model is there any
mechanism to support human well-being or the well-being of the planet. These things
are called "externalities", meaning that they lie outside of the concerns of economic theory,
which simply wasn't designed to deal with any of our life support systems.
This brings me to an even deeper issue of the fact that our monetary system and capitalism
in particular, is a 'scarcity-based' system. In this system, there is no profit to be made
from actually solving problems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



